Understanding comprehension

September 22, 2016, by Rupert Knight

Understanding comprehension

In the wake of the controversy surrounding this year’s KS2 reading test, reading has been very much in the spotlight once again, as seen in this recent TES story.

In this post Jane Medwell explores comprehension as an important aspect of that reading process.

What is comprehension?

Scarborough

Comprehension is what turns “decoding” into “reading”. Understanding the literal meaning of a text is a start to comprehension- but it is not enough. Readers need to be able to understand texts that don’t just say what they mean- and mean things that they don’t say.

Hugely improved sores on the PSC (phonics screening check) have told us that children can do decontextualized phonics (and that teachers are brilliant at preparing them for the check). But this hasn’t produced a great increase in later reading level among the seven year olds who passed the phonics test, as this report from this summer suggests.

There is more to reading than just decoding but if only it was clearer what reading comprehension is.

The Simple View formula presented by Gough and Tunmer in 1986 is:

Decoding (D) x Language Comprehension (LC) = Reading Comprehension (RC)

.

And this view underpins our current approaches to teaching reading. A more complex way of presenting this “simple” view is to think of reading as comprising a number strands woven together. Scarborough (2001) expressed this as a diagram:

This model compares skilled reading to a rope, which consists of many different strands that are essential for the rope (skilled reading) to come together. Let’s look at each “strand”:

Language Comprehension

Word Recognition

These “strands” all work together to enable skilled reading. The strands develop over time and with more teaching and experience. The “Word Recognition” strands become more and more automatic with practice. Fluent readers will simply not be aware of these things happening – unless they encounter a problem.

In the case of the “Language Comprehension” strands, there will be a movement towards becoming more strategic in their use. Readers will become more aware of what they are doing and more in control of it. Of course, the development of comprehension is not time-limited. We all become better, more efficient and more subtle readers as we get older, more experienced, and meet more complex texts. However, just as the skills of word recognition will develop and grow in response to teaching, so too will all aspects of comprehension.

There are many ways of approaching this, and some strong underlying principles. These will be the subject of our next blog on this topic. In the meantime, you may find this model of comprehension skills interesting:

We’d like to hear your views. Which aspects of reading are most challenging for your learners?

References

Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.

Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. Pp. 97-110 in S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds. ) Handbook of Early Literacy. NY: Guilford Press.